2025 Mitsubishi RVR: Rudimentary, Viable, Reasonable

Strong points |
|
---|---|
Weak points |
|
Launched in 2010 as a 2011 model, the Mitsubishi RVR was an instant hit thanks to its friendly face and practical size. At the same time, some people complained about its lack of refinement, but compared to a Jeep Compass or Suzuki SX4, the RVR still had a lot going for it. The problem is that many competitors have joined the segment in the years that followed.
The list includes the Chevrolet Trax, Honda HR-V, Mazda CX-3 and Subaru XV Crosstrek. Introduced in 2013, the latter has become the best-selling small SUV in Canada, offering hybrid and plug-in hybrid variants in the process, plus a Wilderness model designed for extreme adventure with the current, third generation.
- Also: Top 10 Longest-Running Vehicle Designs in 2025
- Also: Top 10 Most Affordable SUVs and Crossovers in 2025
Meanwhile, the RVR has remained basically unchanged, except for a few cosmetic tweaks, some additional safety features and a new infotainment system to keep up with the times. Evolution is not really part of its vocabulary. Considering that there are a dozen or so contenders to choose from these days, all of them more modern and more compelling than the RVR, how does Mitsubishi manage to stay relevant?

Peace of mind for customers is one part of the answer. You see, the RVR is inexpensive to buy and maintain, has low ownership costs (including insurance) and proves highly reliable. On top of all that, just like any other Mitsubishi, it’s backed by the best warranty in the industry.
On the other hand, major compromises have to be made when it comes to refinement and technology. Stepping inside a Mitsubishi RVR will take you back to the days when the BlackBerry was the hottest thing and features like keyless access and ignition were considered luxuries. Heck, you won’t even find those in some 2025 RVR models.
The cabin, to be clear, is quite conservative and rudimentary. Look for an overabundance of black plastics, analog gauges in front of the steering wheel and a centre display with woefully obsolete graphics. On the flip side, the seats are surprisingly comfortable. The driving position is beyond reproach, as is visibility, while space in the second row and in the trunk is more than adequate for young families.

World Engine Lives On
The RVR uses a long-established, tried-and-tested powertrain—the same one that was initially bolted under the hood of the Mitsubishi Lancer and Hyundai Elantra in 2007, not to mention the Dodge Caliber, Jeep Compass and Patriot. This so-called “World Engine” was used by different manufacturers across the globe. Today, only the RVR uses it (the Outlander PHEV notwithstanding). It’s a durable albeit unrefined powerplant with higher-than-average fuel consumption.
Except for the base RVR ES models that come with a 148-hp 2.0-litre unit, every model in the lineup gets a 168-hp 2.4-litre unit. The extra 20 hp make a fairly notable difference in terms of acceleration, and fuel consumption is basically even. Mitsubishi claims a combined 9.1 L/100 km with the smaller engine and 9.4 L/100 km with the bigger one (both in AWD configuration). The ES is also available with FWD, by the way, saving customers $2,000.

Paired with a CVT that is no source of fun, as you can imagine, the 2.4-litre engine delivers adequate power and torque. It performs even better than many of its rivals, such as the 2.0-litre engines in the Hyundai Kona and Nissan Kicks, which generate 147 hp and 141 hp, respectively.
Comfortable and well-balanced, the RVR feels safe and confident on the road and is blessed with an AWD system that enables drivers to lock the differential for 50-50 torque distribution between the two axles. Noise levels increase as the vehicle goes faster, further revealing its old age along the way.
One more thing: ES and SE models ride on small 16-inch wheels with high-profile tires that affect stability and handling. The available 18-inch wheels on SEL, Noir and GT models are a much different story.

Which One Should You Choose?
The RVR stands out primarily by offering excellent value including a remarkably cheap price, unbeatable warranty and some of the lowest ownership costs in the segment. The top-of-the line GT model? Not so much. Sure, you get desirable features like a panoramic roof, leather seating surfaces and a powerful audio system, but similarly priced competitors prove way more advanced and more attractive.
Go with the ES model for the cheapest SUV in town, or pay a little more by upgrading to the SE, if only to get the 2.4-litre engine. In our opinion, the SEL model, which features keyless access and start, 18-inch wheels, synthetic leather and a heated steering wheel, gives you probably the best value for your money (around $34,000 including all applicable fees).

Of course, the RVR isn't an emotional purchase. Although it still looks good, there are simply more modern, more attractive and admittedly more expensive rivals out there. Mitsubishi's entry-level crossover targets customers who don’t care about the latest fashion trends and technology. Instead, it's aimed at those who want to get the most bang for their buck above all else.
In short, this is a value pick in the small SUV segment. Depreciation will be slow considering that you can’t find cheaper alternatives on the market. In other words, in percentage terms, the RVR won't lose more value than a Subaru Crosstrek or Toyota Corolla Cross—unless you opt for a GT model priced at over $38,000.