Mazda MX-5: More Frugal Than Ever

The Mazda MX-5 always represented the perfect middle ground between fuel economy and driving pleasure. With its selection of small engines and its light weight, the roadster is the perfect vehicle to enjoy under the sun without draining your bank account.

With the most recent update of the MX-5, we learned that the ND would be lighter than the outgoing model. When a car gets lighter, it usually means that fuel consumption will be reduced. The EPA published their ratings for the Japanese roadster, and we are pleasantly surprised with their results.

The 2016 Mazda MX-5 will be frugal. According to the EPA numbers, the car is rated at 8.7 litres per 100 km in the city, 6.9 litres on the highway and an average of 7.9 litres per 100 km.

These numbers are for the manual-equipped MX-5; the automatic drinks even less fuel on the highway, with a projected consumption of 6.5 litres per 100 km.

Mazda points out that these numbers mean that the new MX-5 is 25% more eco-friendly than it was last year.

Share on Facebook

More on the subject

First Drives2016 Mazda MX-5: The Wait Is Over!
The wait is over. Direct from Barcelona, Spain, behold our first impressions of the world’s most anticipated sports car: the Mazda MX-5. Exclusive to The Car Guide, the program included test driving a rare prototype of Mazda’s new Roadster and the MX-5. The first is powered by a 1.5-litre four-cylinder …
First Drives2016 Mazda MX-5: More Distinctive and Deluxe
Following months of speculation and rumours, the new, fourth-generation Mazda MX-5 was unveiled at three simultaneous events held in Tokyo, Barcelona and Monterey. To celebrate the newest edition of the world’s most popular roadster, Mazda organized a private event in Monterey with Duran Duran, the group that topped the charts …
NewsUnlimited Mileage Warranty For Mazda Canada
We know that it’s not easy for a manufacturer to roll out a new technology. As soon as they try to do something groundbreaking, members from the competition (and sometimes journalists) use the same argument: it’s too new, it has yet to prove it’s reliable, you will be safer using …